A Tory Budget with nothing to offer Croydon

Read and watch Steve’s speech in the debate following the Spring Budget.

We are here to consider the Budget that the Government have put forward for the country. I want to speak about its impact on my constituents.

Like the rest of the country, Croydon is experiencing a social care crisis. Older and disabled people regularly visit my office to say they cannot get home care and that they do not get adequate support when they leave hospital. Local charities are telling me that the funding that they need has dried up as well.

After the Chancellor ignored the social care crisis in his autumn statement, we were hoping for better this time. Although £2 billion extra over three years is a welcome start, it goes absolutely nowhere near resolving this crisis. These services have already been cut by £5 billion since 2010. Some 26% fewer people receive help today, even though there are more older people needing such help. The King’s Fund projects a £2.8 billion funding gap every year by the end of this decade, but only £2 billion is being made available over three years, so all I can say to my older constituents and the disabled people who come to ask me what the Government are doing to help them is that the Chancellor has responded to their plight by imposing yet more cuts.

It is galling to see the Department for Communities and Local Government offering Surrey County Council a sweetheart deal that is denied to Croydon and people living in every other part of the country. It is not only Surrey that has this problem to deal with, but every local authority. Every community is struggling with it. I regret immensely that the Secretary of State failed to answer my question about whether he knew in advance about the letter that was sent from his Department to Surrey County Council offering it a sweetheart deal. We need to know whether he knew about that in advance of its being withdrawn. If he was party to it, the House needs to know that that is how he is attempting to operate within his Department and, if he did not know about it, the House needs to know that he has no grip on what his officials are up to. His constant evasion of the question will not suffice. We need answers from the Secretary of State; I am sure that in time we will get them.

Particularly painful to my constituents will be the planned hike in national insurance contributions for the self-employed. Croydon North is one of the most ethnically diverse constituencies in the country. Unfortunately, unemployment is particularly high among many minority communities. Their desire to work and their strong enterprising spirit means that many people from these communities set up their own businesses. Self-employed people work as taxi drivers, van drivers, hairdressers, plumbers, decorators, childminders—all sorts of jobs. They work very long hours, often for very modest pay. In Croydon, well over one in 10 workers are self-employed. It makes no sense whatsoever to clobber them with new tax rises. They need help and support, not further barriers to work.

Mr Jackson

So what does the hon. Gentleman say to the respected Institute for Fiscal Studies and the much respected Resolution Foundation, which are today stating specifically that the measures that he identifies are progressive and ameliorate inequality in the tax system between people on pay-as-you-earn and those who are self-employed?

Mr Reed

Perhaps Conservative Members, including the hon. Gentleman himself, should have thought about that before they stood for election on a manifesto that said absolutely categorically that there would be

“no increases in…National Insurance contributions”.

It does nothing for trust in politics when politicians say one thing to persuade people to vote for them but then, once they are elected, do the polar opposite. They are helping to further break trust in this House and trust in politics. This is not down to the IFS; it is down to Tory Central Office, the Prime Minister, the Chancellor of the Exchequer and—dare I say it?—the hon. Gentleman himself, if he is going to vote for the proposal. Given all the uncertainty about Brexit—it is shocking that the Chancellor had so little to say about Brexit in his statement—small businesses and the self-employed need reassurances, not broken promises.

I now turn to those in employment, because this Budget has very little to offer them either. Low pay and stagnant wages have become endemic. Most people have seen no growth in household incomes in the 10 years since the global financial crash; indeed, many have seen a real-terms cut. The British economy might be getting richer, but British working people are getting poorer. Ours is the only advanced economy in which wages fell while the economy grew between 2007 and 2015. In Croydon, average earnings have fallen by 7.6% in real terms, and today more than one third of my constituents earn less than a real living wage. So where has the money gone? Who has taken the proceeds of that growth? It is not the vast majority of people in Croydon or across Britain who work round the clock to pay the bills and put food on the table, but the shrinkingly small number of the super-rich whose interests this Government really represent. Wages are stuck and household debt is soaring, but the Chancellor had absolutely nothing to say about any of it.

Peter Dowd

Is my hon. Friend aware of today’s Resolution Foundation report that says that the UK is set for the worst decade for pay growth in 200 years?

Mr Reed

That is absolutely shocking, but it reflects what we are seeing in our constituencies and what our constituents are telling us.

Once upon a time in this country, there was a covenant between people and Government. People gave their consent to the system in return for a fair reward for the work they put in. There was an understanding that if people worked hard, they would do well. They could expect a decent home, security for their family, and healthcare when they fell ill or grew old, and that if they could not work, they would be looked after with dignity and respect. But today that covenant is broken. The unfairness and inequality that this Government stoke has bred resentment that has catapulted us out of the European Union and over a cliff edge into uncertainty.

Mr Jackson

I cannot allow the hon. Gentleman to propagate this myth. The gap between the poorest and richest 10% of our population was the highest that it has ever been under a Labour Government. This Government, I am proud to say, have delivered something that was never delivered in 13 years of a Labour Government: a national living wage to assist the poorest members of our community who are in work.

Mr Reed

This Government have absolutely divided the country. They have divided different parts of the country and communities from each other. I will give a statistic that shows how they have done it. Since they came to power in 2010, the 10 poorest councils in the country have experienced cuts 17 times bigger than those faced by the 10 richest. If that is not divisive, I do not know what is. This is happening on top of the fact that jobs have been lost to automation, factories have moved abroad, British people are denied the investment, skills and training that they need to compete in a global economy, and wages are stagnating. The Tories have made all this worse by targeting the poorest communities for the biggest scale of cuts. They have put the greatest burden on the weakest shoulders, and they have done so as a deliberate political tactic.

Adam Afriyie (Windsor) (Con)

The picture of doom and gloom that the hon. Gentleman paints is completely disconnected from the reality for people overall. Will he at least acknowledge that those in the lowest quartile have had a bigger tax cut than those in the highest quartile?

Mr Reed

We do not need to hear anything about tax cuts from Conservative Members, given that they have just broken their solemn electoral promise not to raise taxes if elected back into government. Only yesterday we saw the Chancellor standing at the Dispatch Box proposing to raise taxes. Conservative Members will have to vote on that, and it will be very interesting to see how many follow it through and how many do not.

The truth is that the Government have divided our country. With this Budget, they are doing absolutely nothing to bring it back together again.

School faces fourth year in temporary classrooms

Steve Reed MP has demanded Government intervention after primary school children were told they could spend their entire primary education in temporary classrooms. Paxton Primary Academy opened in temporary accommodation on Brigstock Road, Thornton Heath, with a promise it would move into a new permanent site on the London Road within a year. Work has […]

Steve calls on PM to launch racism in mental health services inquiry

Steve Reed MP has called on the Prime Minister to launch an inquiry into institutional racism in the mental health services. Steve raised the case of Olaseni Lewis at Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday 1 March. Mr Lewis, known as Seni, was a 23 year old from Thornton Heath who died in 2010 after being […]

Parliament’s vote on Brexit

A number of constituents have contacted Steve about Brexit and the forthcoming vote in the House of Commons. You can read Steve’s response below. — “The Supreme Court has now determined that Parliament must be consulted before the Government can trigger Article 50 which will start two years of negotiations before the UK leaves the […]

Autumn Statement and equality debate

Steve Reed MP’s speech in a Commons debate on the Autumn Statement and equality: I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Rotherham (Sarah Champion) on securing this important debate, and I am pleased that she referred in her excellent contribution to maternity and paternity leave, because I would like to focus on the plight […]

Two years of rail chaos – Southern’s fare rise must be scrapped

Croydon North MP Steve Reed has demanded ministers scrap the planned rise in fares on Southern Rail. Speaking in Parliament, Steve said rail passengers from Croydon had ‘suffered enough after two years of rail chaos’ and urged the Government to rule out a fare rise in 2017. Rail Minister Paul Maynard refused to act, meaning despite […]

Government must reverse cuts to Croydon’s schools

Steve Reed, MP for Croydon North, has called on the Chancellor to use the upcoming Autumn Statement to reverse school funding cuts. New figures released by the National Union of Teachers show that school funding in Croydon North is expected to fall by £337 per pupil by 2020 – an average 7% budget cut per […]

Steve’s Premature Birth Bill granted Second Reading

The House of Commons has backed Steve’s Ten Minute Rule Motion, which will allow him to introduce his Maternity and Paternity Leave (Premature Birth) Bill. The Bill aims to extend maternal and paternal for parents of premature babies. Second Reading of the Bill, where MPs will debate the full proposals, will be on 16 December. The campaign […]

Steve introduces proposal to extend leave for parents of premature babies

Steve Reed MP has tabled a change in the law which would extend maternity and paternity leave for parents of premature babies. The Maternity and Paternity Leave (Premature Birth) Bill will be introduced in the House of Commons on Wednesday 26th October. Over 100,000 people have signed a petition calling for the change, launched by Steve’s […]

Steve’s appointment as Shadow Minister for Civil Society

Croydon North MP Steve Reed has been appointed Shadow Minister for Civil Society. He will take up the role in Tom Watson’s Shadow Culture, Media and Sport team and will shadow Government Minister Rob Wilson MP. The role covers the voluntary sector, co-operatives and mutuals, and youth policies including the National Citizen Service. Steve said: […]

Have your say: Boundary changes in Croydon

The Boundary Commission has published proposals to reshape parliamentary constituencies across the country.  Croydon North will be affected and I’m keen to hear what local people think of the proposals.  There will be a further public consultation before final proposals are agreed. The reason the Government has given for making changes is to reduce the […]

@SteveReedMP on Twitter